Knowledge Bank
3 min read
Competitor research on YouTube: find the gap in the top five
Watch the top five videos on your topic before you film. The gap they all leave is the angle that makes a sixth video worth clicking.
Not sure if Plan is your weak phase? The free 3-minute workflow audit will tell you.
Before a topic earns a script, it earns 20 minutes of watching. Open the five videos that already rank for your idea and watch them as a rival, not a fan. You are not there to feel discouraged that the topic is taken. You are there to find the thing all five missed, because that gap is the only reason a sixth video deserves to exist.
Skip this and you tend to make video number six that says what one through five already said, slightly worse, to an audience that has watched the better ones. The algorithm has nowhere to put that. Competitor research is how you avoid being a fainter copy of a result that already exists.
Watch the top five, not the top fifty
Search your topic the way a viewer would phrase it, then watch the first five results properly. Not the thumbnails, the videos. Five is plenty: the top results are what your video sits beside, and they share the patterns YouTube currently rewards for that query. Fifty would just be procrastination with a notepad.
Watch for what they all do the same, and what they all skip. Keep two columns.
| What all five do | What none of them do |
|---|---|
| Open with the same framing | Show the actual result on screen first |
| Aim at people who already do this | Speak to a complete beginner's first attempt |
| Assume the expensive kit | Cover the budget version honestly |
The right-hand column is your shortlist of angles. You want the gap the top five leave unmet for a specific viewer.
The gap is usually one of three things
- A different viewer. The top five all speak to people who already own the gear. Nobody made the version for the person deciding whether to buy it.
- A different depth. Everyone covers the what. Nobody shows the actual process end to end, including the part where it goes wrong.
- A fresher answer. The top result is three years old and the tool has changed twice since. Current beats clever.
Steal structure, not substance
There is a fair line and an unfair one. Noticing that the strongest videos front-load the payoff in the first 30 seconds is structure, and structure is shared craft. Lifting their actual points, examples and script is substance, and substance is theirs. Take the shape, bring your own filling.
Watching as a rival also calibrates your packaging. You see which thumbnails you scrolled past and which made you click, on the exact page yours will appear. That is free thumbnail research for the Package phase, gathered before you film a second.
Where Chewbr fits
Scout the competition is step 3 of the 47, right after the date goes in the calendar and right before the keyword check. It sits early on purpose: the gap you find here often rewrites the promise you locked in step one, and rewriting a sentence is cheap. Rewriting a finished video is not.
Keep reading
Once you have found the gap, check that people are actually searching for it: a two-minute keyword check, no paid tools, tells you fast. If the same gap keeps showing up, that is often a sign you have a format worth running again rather than a one-off.