Satire

The distinction matters legally. Parody targets the work it borrows from, mocking that song or film directly, and US courts have treated that as a strong fair use argument since Campbell v. Acuff-Rose in 1994, on the reasoning that you cannot mock a work without using it. Satire uses a work as a vehicle to attack something else, a politician or an industry or society at large, and that reasoning does not transfer, because you could have made the same point with material you owned.

None of this stops a Content ID claim. Fair use is a defence argued after the fact, no jurisdiction outside the US uses that exact framework, and a satirical video can be claimed, demonetised or blocked long before anyone weighs its merits.